Imported election fraud claims just don’t stack up in NZ

The differences between New Zealand's elections and the United States are vast. Some people in New Zealand are recycling America's false "stolen election" conspiracy theories here when it just doesn't make sense.

Courts have found that big claims about fraud in the last US presidential election were baseless. Sore loser stuff. But beyond that, New Zealand elections work very, very differently, so no matter what you think about what happened in the US, it’s not going down like that here.

Our elections are rigged! The globalists stole the US election from Donald Trump, and they’re going to do the same thing here!

  • New Zealand elections don’t use voting machines
  • In New Zealand elections votes are counted and re-counted by hand
  • New Zealand elections are run by a single non-partisan government agency

Claims of electoral fraud are sadly becoming a staple of US political discourse. The claims generally assume one or more of these forms:

  • Voting machines are insecure and being hacked
  • Voting machines are secure but manipulated by corrupt officials
  • Election workers manipulate the count
  • Votes are cast in the name of dead people
  • Postal ballots are manipulated

US political discourse travels here and so does US misinformation. It’s not surprising therefore that some local conspiracy theorists are recycling US election fraud claims. But while we applaud recycling in principle, our local conspiracy theorists are not taking care to make sure their reused claims make sense in the New Zealand environment.

(Before we go further it’s worth noting that the baseless claims made about Dominion and Smartmatic voting systems have resulted in hefty defamation suits…)

Unlike the US, New Zealand does not use voting machines in any way. Claims that NZ elections can be influenced with voting machines, whether from Dominion or another manufacturer, fall apart when you realise that here we only use paper ballots. (Exception for overseas votes, which are made by marking up a PDF or scanning a printed out paper, but still inspected visually by a returning officer).

In the US, election officials can be elected themselves, or appointed by partisan elected representatives. This might give rise to concern that they could favour their own party (although seemingly in states like Georgia this does not seem to have been the case). But in New Zealand, the Electoral Commission is a non-partisan agency set up as an independent Crown Entity with a board appointed by the governor-general. Board members are typically appointed for 5 years and their terms don’t overlap with Parliament’s. Every election in New Zealand the Electoral Commission puts together a large temporary workforce to manage enrolments and conduct the election itself. 

US elections require totals from many different local processes to be added together in ways that also can be local to county or state level. This means their counting processes are very complex and auditing is difficult, over and above the challenges that come just from sheer size and scale. In New Zealand however, a much smaller country, our elections are run by the Electoral Commission alone in a consistent and transparent way. It’s easy to understand and the paper system provides safeguards against double voting and other kinds of fraud.

Likewise, New Zealand’s small size and relatively unified government means it’s not feasible to swing an election with dead voters: the Department of Internal Affairs notifies the Electoral Commission of deaths, and these are matched with voter rolls.

Some US states allow postal ballots, and as a result, claims have been made that ballots are collected up and mass-delivered to swing results (although exactly how is not made clear). These claims have been solidly debunked, but beyond that: New Zealand does not use postal ballots in general elections. It’s not going to happen here, because it can’t happen

You might be detecting a theme here. Two very different countries run elections in very different ways.

In the US context, it’s not hard to see why these claims have prima facie value. American elections are run through a myriad of different systems and processes at a very local level. Historically, some local elections have suffered from fraud. And reputable researchers have concluded that voting machines may be vulnerable to attack. So there is a grain of truth that means claims of fraud do need to be considered.

However, because we do things in a much simpler and more transparent way here, people who think they can just replay the same stories in New Zealand need to think again.

Letters & resources

Resource: How to Avoid Media Manipulation Attempts

Resource: How to Avoid Media Manipulation Attempts

Responsible Reporting on False Information. A new resource with tips for how media professionals can minimise narrative hijacking by conspiracy theorists and extremists, and maximise their ability to report on important events. Download now.

Prebunking election misinformation

River of Freedom – Dispatches From the Mirror World

River of Freedom – Dispatches From the Mirror World

A FACT member ventured into the rosy mirror world of the documentary River of Freedom to see what has been airbrushed from the New Zealand Parliament Occupation. The results is a distorted and aggrandised piece of propaganda, removed from the reality we lived through.
Fringe parties and their COVID policy

Fringe parties and their COVID policy

All of the policies demanded by parties seeking the "freedom movement" vote are already government policy, except stopping the vaccine rollout. So why are they calling for that and why do they want an "independent inquiry"?
Why do some parties claim their free speech is under attack?

Why do some parties claim their free speech is under attack?

There's a lot to be said about free speech as an important cornerstone of a free and fair society. But does that mean that all speech is protected? Well, no. Some speech can incite harm on our community. Find out why conspiracy theorists are using this topic as a policy platform.
Minor parties policies target imaginary “globalist” plots. WHY?

Minor parties policies target imaginary “globalist” plots. WHY?

Strange isn't it, that conspiracy theorist parties this election all have policies about reviewing or leaving international bodies like the UN, WEF and WHO. It's a tale as old as time, misinterpreting non-binding agreements as sinister "globalist" plots to control you. Let's dive in to the origins of these unfounded fears.
Why conspiracy theorists are obsessed with the Bill of Rights Act

Why conspiracy theorists are obsessed with the Bill of Rights Act

The government was careful to maintain the rule of law during the pandemic. It allowed itself to be challenged in court, and accepted rulings against it. That seems like the opposite of tyranny. But the conspiracists belief that they are fighting “tyranny” is one of the reasons you’re hearing so much about NZBORA.
Our politicians are selected

Our politicians are selected

NZ politicians are selected by their party and elected by us, not by a global cabal of "them". Quite simple really, but gird your loins for a long explanation of this conspiratorial thought-terminating cliche and why it's nearly impossible for it to be true.
FALSE CLAIM: “They” manipulate the count

FALSE CLAIM: “They” manipulate the count

We count votes by hand in this country, and we count them carefully… but it seems like not everybody knows that. And it’s normal for the final result to change after election night, but not everyone gets that either.